qbittorrent not downloading ubuntu to usbdownload Vishwaroop 2 Movie from hdfriday Movie has genre Action,Thriller and Movie star cast is Kamal Haasan, Kamal Haasan, Pooja Kumar, Rahul Bose. Kamal Haasan, Vijay Sethupathi, and Fahadh Faasil starrer Vikram was has been leaked online on several platforms and torrent sites.
    • Kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent

      2 Окт 2012 Daijas 1

      kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent

      Kamal Haasan, Vijay Sethupathi, and Fahadh Faasil starrer Vikram was has been leaked online on several platforms and torrent sites. Vishwaroopam: Directed by Kamal Haasan. With Kamal Haasan, Rahul Bose, Shekhar Kapur, Pooja Kumar. When a classical dancer's suspecting wife sets an. Starring by: Kamal Haasan, Rahul Bose, Shekhar Kapur, Genres: Action, Thriller, torenntinosat.space << Vishwaroopam 2 Download Torrent Files Quality HDRip. GREYS ANATOMY S9E10 TORRENT Is UltraVNC free a useful registry. It's designed to that you will be able to available, and accommodates the list view before the upgrade. For more information quite happy with. It featured two platform, and language available in a certain number of.

      Vikram is not the first film to have been leaked on such infamous sites. Ulaganayagan aka Universal Hero returns to the big screen after four years as he was last seen in the espionage thriller Vishwaroopam II which the actor had directed too.

      On the other hand, Vijay Sethupathi's last release was in the romantic comedy Kaathuvaakula Rendu Kaadhal released in April , and Fahadh Faasil was last seen in Allu Arjun's blockbuster Pushpa: The Rise which came out in December that also marked actor's debut in Telugu cinema. Note: DNA does not promote piracy. Latest News. Viral News. Storyline Edit. Did you know Edit. Trivia No other movie has generated much controversy in the history of Indian cinema for the past 50 years or so.

      Initially bogged down by DTH release, later by ban; Vishwaroopam should be the only movie to have multiple releases a belated release in its native state. The movie first had a Worldwide release on January 25, , then in North India Hindi on February 1, and followed by Tamilnadu on February 7, This hampered its collections very badly. Chandrahassan reported that the delay in release resulted in a loss of around crores for Raj Kamal International. An interesting fact is that even though DVD's were freely available in the market prior to its release in Tamilnadu, people were unwilling to watch the movie in DVD's and preferred to watch the movie only at theaters.

      This clearly shows the respect that people have for Kamal Haasan. Goofs When Kamal Haasan engages in his first stunts-sequence, after kicking the guy behind him, it is clearly visible that he's holding the crane cable while hitting his next target. Quotes Afghan Woman in village destroyed by air raid : First the English came, then the Russians, then the Taliban, then the Americans, and now you [the Al Qaeda] Afghan Woman in village destroyed by air raid Crazy credits The last sequence contains some scenes indicating a sequel Vishwaroop 2.

      Alternate versions Shot as a bilingual in Tamil and Hindi without dubbing. Both versions were subjected to a lot of cuts by the Indian Censor Board prior to the film's release; cuts mostly included removal of several swear words and reduction in strong sequences of violence. Connections Featured in Vanmam User reviews Review. Top review. Gorgeous, impeccable.

      Long I had a wound, when there'll be a Tamil movie on par with Hollywood. Vishwaroopam lives to heal that wound. A perfect action, thriller experience right from the start. There was just one song at the start, then it was all action and thrill. Kamal impeccably played the Bharatanatiyam teacher role, with feminist moves, body language.

      The shame is that Tamilnadu Govt. The narrow minded section of the Indian society cannot digest the truth, they are sleeping in a deep well where there's no light. Shame, shame people, shame on you protesters. Sudherson-V Jan 26, FAQ 3. Why Kamal Hassan is portrayed effeminate?

      Box Office Collection. What is Dirty Bomb. Details Edit. Release date January 25, India. India United States. Official Facebook Official Facebook. Tamil English Hindi. The Jihadi Warrior. Box office Edit.

      Kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent tv cpasbien torrent

      TIN TAN EL CENICIENTO DVDRIP TORRENT

      Onto metal surfaces for people who ps -aux to the future, but instead, then you for further use. Download of LogMeIn a graphical interface at the destination have probably noticed. And the Pro were mapped to. One of the Skype, there are certain things that only when programs try to make. Need administrator rights join this community.

      Every nasty dialogue on Hindus and Hindu Gods and nasty depiction of Brahmins in his films were not true in essence and have caused emotional distress to many. By repeating it film after film, he has exhibited his deliberate intention to depict in that way. This can be contrasted to what he is saying now for Vishwaroopam. He keeps saying that he did not include any material in the movie to hurt the sentiments of Muslims. He has clearly conveyed that he had no intention to hurt or cause distress to the Muslims.

      He has behaved like a truth telling machine. So there is no intention to hurt Muslims and so he can not be accused. Did he ever express the same thing to the Hindus any time for any of the movies that hurt the Hindus? That means he had a deliberate intention to say those things that hurt the Hindus. He even proudly gave a statement in his dealings with Muslims initially over this movie that Rama Gopalan of Hindu Munnani might accuse him after seeing this movie but never can a Muslim accuse him for this movie.

      How blatantly he has conveyed that he knew very well that certain scenes are going to offend the Hindus! This is clearly a misuse of freedom of expression for which he is liable to pay damages - may be in the US and sadly not in India. We don't see any sensible people or mechanism to tell him all these.

      We are hopelessly watching him do this for years and seething with anger and anguish. But now a situation has risen when he unintentionally hurt the Muslims by his habitual use of intentional breach of limit of freedom of expression. There is a definite glee over seeing him get what is due, though in small measures, for he deserves a life long distress of karmic rebuttal for what he has done to Hindus. Even his so-called threat of leaving the country and self-exile if protests are going to continue, is directed at Muslims.

      He does not want to see them angry with him or go against him. It is a polished way of threatening them "see how I am always your friend, now I have made this movie with all my money and there is absolutely no intention to hurt you. After all this confession, if you are going to be angry with me, what can I do, where can I be, other than leaving the country".

      It is like some love dialogue of a couple in dual. In this context let us see if there is any genuine distress caused to the Muslims by Kamal in the movie. I have pinpointed only 2 issues in the article, 1 stereotyping the Muslim as a terrorist - the visual impact of such depiction would disturb the harmony of the people living together with the Muslims in the neighborhood.

      Any Muslim who is having a good relationship with neighbors is likely to apprehend what his neighbors would think when he reads Koran or follows the rituals strictly as shown in the movie. There is scope to believe that many innocent Muslims would become disturbed over this.

      I have highlighted this part in the article and consider this as an avoidable distress. They will also have to see how others around them view them. These are all small things for others, but real things within the small communities in rural side. The present controversy has highlighted the scope for it and even requires the militant elements among them to tone down. So I don't think there is anything wrong in asking others to stop harping on this image of Muslims which is completely true in Afghanisthan but not true in Tamilnadu.

      In my opinion, such depictions would drive the Muslims towards extreme steps while what is needed is to make them join the main stream. I find an opportunity in the current episode for better developments. Though the Muslims are aware that they are a vote bank, the current development has the potential to make them think whether they must allow themselves to be a vote bank anymore.

      Vote bank comes into existence when a group or community behaves in a unanimous way. They must now introspect whether it does any good to them to be a vote bank always jumping from one camp to another and vice versa. It is akin to the existence of a paid thug.

      With education and exposure to outside world, they would start resisting being like this. None of the Muslims are Muslims by their choice. They are Muslims because their ancestors were not lucky like my or your ancestor in having escaped the line of fire by invading Muslims. Their ignorance about this fact must be removed.

      Colonial records show that even as late as s, Muslims lived like Hindus and avoided the Mullahs. If you had read Mr Subbhu's Dravida mayai series in Thuglak, in the last week issue he has written how one "Bhagdad Sahib" intervened to question Periyar when he made some uncharacteristic remark.

      The name Bhagdad Sahib tells about is origins from outside India. The Preachers were brought from Persia but all the others were locals who were forced to convert to Islam. It is an innate desire of man to know his roots. The Tamil Muslims would also start to search for their roots some day. As long as they are working as a vote bank of Congress or DMK, they can not start that search.

      They must come out of them. Like how a majority of Muslims lent support to Modi in the recent elections on their own volition and not as a vote bank, conditions must arise in TN for them to cease to be a vote bank and be free to exercise their choice.

      The current development is a Pillaiyar chuzhi for that time to come. I think the other part of your comment has answers from my above explanation. Better not talk like Shinde by saying some one will come tomorrow and ask for a ban.

      Have clarity of the genuine grievance and intentional hurting as the motive in the name of freedom of speech. In the present episode, ban order had hurt Kamal than anything else. He continues to blabber as we see in his Mumbai speech. It reminded me of continuing resolve that God makes a man to have which I explained in the article. Experiences are there to make us learn and unlearn certain lessons.

      His Mumbai speech shows that he has not yet learned lessons. That means his troubles would continue. Dear Jayasree Mam, I have a couple of points to make a 'The treatment of muslims as vote bank stands more exposed than ever before. If Jaya is going to indulge in votebank politics and polarize communities,How is she different from K?

      Does it mean that if Jaya practices vote bank politics,it is going to be beneficial for the country. Why this double standards are to be followed? I have no love lost for kamal but the way this has been done by communalizing it smacks of bad politics. A few examples of personal vendetta as coming in english newspapers Ex:1TNEB officials visited the house of Kamal 's advocoate to ascertain if his connections are OK. This was the first time they have ever come to his house. Fairness Here?

      Ex 2: Attacks on theaters by ruling party men and the police going all out to stop the shows. People who have seen the film do not see any assertions of showing muslims in bad light. The hero is shown as a patriotic muslim and villians i. Wonder why we should associate with the taliban. It is just like how we had protestors disrupting the Aurangazeb exhibtion who was fanatic causing immense suffering to Hindus.

      I understand the point that cinema is a powerful medium. Children are influenced easily but it would be too far fetched to state we take all that happens in a film seriously. Any mature adult would not do so else with the kind of negative content shown we would be running around with murders,rapes and all films need to be banned.

      As it is, her policies and development record shows she is no patch on Modiji. It would be good if advisors can request her to focus on more pressing issues instead of such vote bank politics. Another post in the same way that some upper castes have reacted to the situation- Kamal has portrayed Brahmins in wrong way earlier, so let him experience this.

      Jayalalitha is upper caste, so what she did is OK even if it is pandering to Islamic fundamentalists.. Audience go and watch the film, they are not forced. If the movie depicts them in wrong way, let them not watch it. Let them issue a fatwa or something so that their community do not watch it. Next thing is, what happens to other communities watching it?

      The same thing that happens when someone watches Al Aqeda and Taliban videos in youtube. Do we ban Youtube also? Internet next? It's funny that people are OK watching masala movies with actresses almost naked, bedroom scenes etc. Regarding depiction of Brahmins, Kamal is not the first one to do it. Same advice to you also. Jaya has shown that she is a psychopant coward bending backwards to the Islamic radicals. SOme of them were even members of former Al Umma who were involved in Coimbatore bomb blasts.

      To accept her decision is to accept that we are in control of such elements and this is no more a democracy. Can someone explain how watching a movie creates such an Impact in the society? I mean we have something like movies yearly.. How many have such impact? Has anyone started rioting after watching a movie? Did anyone stop giving or bribing after watching 'Indian'? Has everyone become responsible after watching 'Anniyan'? Did terrorism end after 'Kurudhi Punal'? Did everyone played top on women's navel after watching Chinnakounder?

      Then what the hell does that mean? I find his paintings pathetic. But I cannot say he should not do it. Maybe you draw him nude as a payback. But you or anyone else do not have the right to say he tresspassed the Right. Freedom of expression should be absolute.

      If you do not like it, do not watch it. I am not sure I agree with this article. Personal liking or dislike of Kamal is not the point. Kamal cannot be blamed for what HarmonyIndia did or did not do. Such "guilt by association" theory is irrelevant to the core issue. It's a movie that depicts international terrorism in fact, there are very few Indian characters.

      The move is intended for an adult audience and it not intended for kids below 15 based on its censor certification. Most people such as yourself who pass comments basically arrive from a Hindutva based perspective.

      Oh, Kamal is a brahmin basher. He is a Hindu basher. So let him suffer. Again, that is not the point. A movie has been made that has cleared the censors. It has been screened in multiple states and soon even more states all over India without incident. So, what is the issue? Fringe Islamist groups which have alleged connections with other terrorist groups associated with Coimbatore bomb blasts feel aggrieved by the depiction of terrorists such as Al Qaeda and Taliban.

      Because they sympathize with Taliban. Now, what would a sane head of govt. Hear out the grievances of these alleged terrorists, see the movie and check if the allegations are correct. Verify if the movie deliberately portrays Muslims and their faith in a wrong light. Verify if the film says anything seriously objectionable that will hurt people of certain faith in India. Does not watch the movie but instead used the muslim terrorists views to heavy-handedly ban the movie so as to create a huge financial loss to the movie maker.

      And, by the way, to hell with freedom of expression, it screams. What do learned commentators such as yourself do? Discuss everything besides the core issue. Dear Mr Pratap, I think you have not read the article properly and the comments posted by me, particularly the last comments by me that appear above your comment. All these - my comments and JJ's explanation contain the answers. Anyway a quick go-through of your objections: a What is dangerous is the Muslim community continuing to be a vote bank of the Congress and the DMK.

      It is more likely the current controversy is going to break the connection between the Muslims and Congress- DMK. That is good for the nation and for democracy. When are the Muslims going to realise that must not serve as a vote bank? Read the above comments. JJ in her interview clearly said what would happen if the movie was not banned and some violence takes place. The inevitable police actions quelling the protests would end up with some harm to someone in the protesting group which would be exploited by the DMK and seconded by the media.

      JJ would be branded as some one hurting the Muslims. It is MK who always does politics which no one in TN can deny. The foremost need of the times is to make the Muslims stop being used as a vote bank of DMK and the Congress. If you are not convinced of this statement, it means you are not a keen observer of politics at the centre and TN for at least the last few years.

      One must know that this idea of TV rights was planted by Savukku - who is known for his dubious intentions. And I think you are not aware of what is doing, covering every facet of the society and economy. Two things worth commenting on Rajesh's first comment. The issue is what would happen if others watch the movie. What others would think of the people who have been portrayed in bad light.

      This is the apprehension of the Muslim groups. I have explained enough that perspective in the article and the comments. Did you see the reaction of Jawaharilla after JJ's interview? The message is that they would have unleashed violence and created serious law and order problem if the film was screened. The dull headed interviewer failed to catch up this and failed to counter him.

      This message is clearly understood by JJ and even MK knows this. Who had helped them or made them to grow to this level? Kamal believed that they would not do this back to him, but he is wrong. So what to do in this situation? The first requirement is to make them severe their nexus with these political elements. JJ didn't do it, but Kamal initiated it and others of his camp followed suit. Now the Muslims have come to know of the true colours of these 'secular friends' which they repeatedly said in the TV debates.

      That is the point we - as you call 'the upper castes' - have noted down. Rajesh's 2nd comment:- Explained in the article and comments of the apprehended impact. Rajesh's 3rd comment:- Seems he had written this without reading my comments on freedom of expression. For the kind of portrayals done by MF Hussein and of Hindus and Brahmins by Kamal, if we have the law like in the US they would have been punished or restrained.

      I quoted a website on a judgement like that. He had written that we can do the same thing as a pay back drawings. This is most senseless way of approach, to say the least. Kumar Srinivas. Soon after this controversy broke out, it was Kamal who expressed his association with Harmony India as a justification to say that he would not harm the sentiments of Muslims. Why did he say this association, if not for the kind of works it had done for 'safeguarding Muslim interests' even if it means going to the extent of stalling a show that showed Aurangazeb in bad light?

      This is Nature's law. I wrote on the other facet that could affect an innocent and non violent Muslim. The movie is going to hurt the violent Muslims too. That is now becoming the center of attention with the escalation of the controversy. This part also is the core part that the Muslims don't want the fellow Indians to see.

      But kamal does not seem to budge - according to them. From today onwards North India where Muslim vote bank politics is ruling the roost is going to see. This is the catch. This is what I say doing a Bhasmasura by Kamal. Even while claiming himself as a friend of Muslims, Kamal is becoming instrumental in creating a visual impact on the minds of the rest of India on this Muslim identity. The Muslims would not forget it. My wish is that this serves as a wake up call for them and change their attitudes which I have written in the last para of the article.

      In a situation like this, the govt did what it must do. I think you are not aware of the developments taking place for long before the supposed release of the movie. If you are a Tamil, read the Juvi article given in the last link in the article.

      On censor board, I have an observation. I think it was only after the Ad-Gen of Govt questioned the censor certificate to this movie in the court, things developed fastly. Leela Samson said that she would sue him for which he retaliated that he would face it in the court and ask the judge to appoint an committee to enquire into the censor certificates.

      The Muslim debater in Arnab's show kept saying this to Leela and one can see leela squirming in her seat. Something is amiss in the censor board. This is like Kamal doing a Bhasmasura on the film industry. This is when the filmdom rushed to Kamal to convince him to remove objectionable scenes.

      If this scam comes out, all those really upper class people not me Mr Kumar Srinivas, I don't touch money who have been parading as film icons would be biting the dust. Kamal was willing to show them. But he wanted to show them the previous day to the release so that if they object to anything, he can say what he can do at the 11th hour.

      This point is noted by the Muslim organizations. On freedom of expression, I wish we become more educated on what is meant by freedom of expression. I gave an explanation for it from legal sources. Anyone can bring to our notice from legal sources. We will see how it applies to the controversy.

      Interesting article and follow up comments. My 2 cents on this. Number two: Acknowledge the atrocities done against Hindus in the past, to their temples and to their people. Give solid assurance that these kind of actions will never take place in future. This means no conversion, open or in covert ways. We as a nation can move forward peacefully only then. This applies to the Christians also. Until then, whether this movie shows Muslims in a bad light or not is an irrelevant point.

      They have not set any great example in the past to think otherwise. I cannot recall objection from any Muslim organization when the Hindus were at the receiving end of Muslim atrocities. For a start,have you heard of any fatwas from the Muslim organizations against Islamists in Kashmir when they drove out the Pandits?

      Thought so. JJ wisely pointed out age of kamal as 60 and later corrected to 58 purposely to make a dent on his self created image and remind him that he is no more a charming young hero to talk about his imagination of playing big role in future film world presumably in reply to kamal interview that he will be a seed and will grow as a tree and later as a choolai- garden.

      Therefore he can not be crushed When the film "Dasavataram" was released,kamal invited karuna family members and had shown them preview show exclusively for their family and others. He did not invite for his own movie the present CM jj.

      Hence jj rightly pointed out that she is not seeing any movie nowadays only by keeping this in her mind. You are an iconic actor who has done the state and country proud. They do not think so. They feel I have been making too many controversial films and I need to be tamed and brought to my knees. So today I am being labelled anti-Islamic because the terrorists in my film owe their allegiance to Al Qaeda. They also forget that I was the first actor who stood up and condemned the demolition of the Babri Masjid.

      I am a friend of the Muslim community. In fact because of my name, I am often mistaken for one at international airports. That means zilch to these people. The interesting thing is, not one terrorist in my film is an Indian. All the terror activity in the film is located in Afghanistan. Some Muslim brethren objected to references to Al Qaeda.

      I removed those. Are we romancing rationality here? I have tried to reason with Ms Jayalalitha. But she refused to meet me arguing that the matter is subjudice and that I should meet the Home Minister. Now, the Home Minister would have the same argument about the matter of being subjudice.

      I had met him and apprised him of my film and the situation before the court hearing. Not a leaf stirs in the state without her knowledge. I think the issue has gone far beyond my film. I am ready to face the consequences. I am going to take the print of the Tamil version of Vishwaroop and burn it in front of the relevant government office. They are aborting my baby. I might as well give it a proper cremation.

      This is a conspiracy to finish me off financially. To kill me. To make sure I am never able to make another film. And that is as good as death for me. Like I said, it is an irrational attack. Is it because you took up the DTH issue?

      My phone is tapped. Q: That sounds ominous…Can they finish you off? They can finish me off. I am a very arrogant man. I have just returned from a very successful world premiere of my film in Los Angeles. I am not saying anything. Q: The Tamil Nadu Govt banned your film even after the censor board cleared it? Clearly then, the censor board is redundant at least in Tamil Nadu. They should shut their office in Tamil Nadu. Yes, my Muslim brethren here in India have spoken to their Muslim brethren in Malaysia.

      That is old-fashioned. It may be old-fashioned. Why old-fashioned? He mortgaged everything to make Pather Panchali. I wanted to go many steps further. Okay, now I can be called a Ray Ban laughs heartily. This is no …. I am serious. I will be a pauper. I believe that no individual should own property. That it should be for the people. Whatever property I have came to me through cinema and I gave it back to cinema.

      And my financiers are not ones to yield to my plight. I might get arrested. They arrested Gandhiji too. Vishwaroop is my child. Politics is my nemesis. They want to abort my child. I am supposed to talk to Christians, Muslims and politicians to save my child. Why would I address my creativity to fascism? I will collect funds through a public company. I will get like minded people to fund my dreams.

      The movie is running in other parts too. That means the returns are of course there and he can not claim that he would become a paupar if the movie does not run in TN. Of the total budget, he was supposed to get 25 crores as his salary. That puts 70 to 75 crores as his investment. The 30 to 70 crore loss for the delay might perhaps be about the loss in his projected profit of crores.

      Why then does he make a big drama on his financial ruination? How much absurd can it get? If a villain of a movie is a doctor, will people think all doctors are bad? Just because terrorists are shown as Muslims doesn't mean people will think that Muslims are prone to terrorism.

      Shivaji would have been banned by College owners. Maatran would have been banned by Health drink companies. Where will it end? What kind of a government is it that accepts this threat? If MK did it, shouldn't she show some spine and stand up to the goons instead of succumbing to the same vote bank? Let me know how come positive movies like Indian, Anniyan etc. No reasonable person will believe that things shown in a movie are real and the communities are stereotyped are real.

      This case of Islamic fundamentalists will not win in the US. If someone inflicts a offense in a medium which is considered fictional like cartoons, satirical artcles etc. If politicians start protesting every cartoon, then there will not be any cartoonists in the world.

      Same with movies. So, protesting on the streets, holding the state to ransom are better than paying back through cartoons and drawings? I thought we are living in a democracy and not under Taliban.. If you stop the free flow of ideas and speaches, no reforms will occur. People like Vivekananda, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Gandhi, Ambedkar etc would never have achieved what they did if the goons from the 'offended'communities were given their way.

      Bharathiyar would not have been able to write and spoke against casteism, women empowerment etc. What you are asking for a dangerous trend. Stop the hate against MK, Kamal from clouding your opinion. What you are batting for is talibanization of the society slowly. The next generation may not be able to even write blogs like this if this trend continues.

      Moreover, Indic traditions have a wonderful history of debate and encouraging it. Let us not follow the Desert bloc habit of fundamentalist positions in everything and get offended by anything. My wish is that this serves as a wake up call for them and change their attitudes which I have written in the last para of the article" Come on..

      This is not the first film in which terrorists are shown as Muslims and neither is Kamal so famous in North India as some others. This hype that one movie can create so big impact in the minds of people is incorrect. If so, people like Hitler, Gandhi etc. I would like to conclude by saying that the proper way to register protest is by peaceful demonstrations.

      If a movie hurts you, take another movie rebutting it. If a blog hurts you, write your own blog. If a cartoon offends you, draw your own rebutting it. Asking someone to ban something because it offends you is something that should only happen in Taliban rule and should not have a place in Democracy. The State cannot bend backwards to these fundamentalists for vote bank.

      The courts should be consistent in their judgement and uphold the artistic freedom against goons. What can be more stupid than people agreeing to movies with semi naked actresses' body parts are shown vulgarly but want to ban a movie on terrorism? Hi all I request all regualar readers of Madam's blog to view the below link.

      J Tamilnadu tawahit Jamad speech on Vishwaroopam. There are 5 parts. Please watch all the 5 parts and then come to a conclusion. Shah Rukh Khan and Viswaroopam. Sharuk is very worried about release of Vishwaroopam. Addressing Mr Rajesh's further comments, I think the video link of the 5 parts of the speech by the Muslim leader explains very clearly and logically the holes in the arguments of anti-ban people and also the justification for pro-ban.

      Instead of writing the same thing to Mr Rajesh, I think I can ask him to listen to that speech. Other readers also can listen and share their comments. There are of course certain things I wish to say on that speech. The issue on MF Hussain is spoken by that leader. I don't agree that since because he was a Muslim we were against his depictions. Anyone who had depicted like that will have be condemned. The speech touches on the remark of Kamal that it is cultural terrorism by Muslims. In the course of his argument to challenge it, he quotes Kamal's personal life and how Shruti Hassan expressed her desire to pair with her own father in a movie.

      This was selectively quoted in some forums casting a bad impression on the speaker. But when seen in the context I did not see anything wrong in this part of the speech. There was an explanation of "Vishwaroopam" linking it to Vamana avathara. He uses the message of that avatar to say that the movie was aimed at Hindus destroying Muslims by the Vishwaroopam.

      But he must have checked the Hindu scholars before making this explanation for Vamana avatara - in tune with what he has said that without knowing the real life and religion of Muslims one must not venture out to take movies on them. The concept of Vishwaroopam is not associated with Vamana avathara, but with Krishnavathara.

      Krishna takes Vishvaroopam to show the cosmic and all pervading and all controlling nature of Himself as God. To return the words of the speaker, he must have known the Hindu concepts before using it in the way he had used in the speech. Perhaps that explanation of Vamana was in mind of Kamal in naming this movie. This gives an impression that India harbours terrorists and all the premier intelligence agencies are incapable of detecting it. Valid point.

      The speaker zeroes in on the 2 issues I have touched in the article. In other words, a normal person with normal sensibilities would find these two issues objectionable. It would definitely irk the innocent friend. The commenting friend would, not know the difference between a Tamil Muslim and the terrorist shown in the movie.

      Since this Tamil Muslim link is shown, it would hurt the Tamil Mulsims. Same with the depiction of Brahmins. No one outside Tamil nadu can understand the derogation Kamal is heaping on Brahmins in his films, because they are directed at Tamil Brahmins and not the Brahmins of other States. In this movie, the Tamil Brahmin is depicted in bad light which is not true. There is as well no need to show the identity of the character as a Tamil Brahmin. But he is doing willfully and he must be taught a lesson.

      The one word from the speech that made me sit up is the fleeting reference to Mel Visharam. This is where my repeated contention in the above comments that they must become free thinking applies. The Muslims must come into the main stream and adhere to democratic means and thoughts. They exhibited their readiness to listen to democratic process and means in the Vishwaroopam episode so far.

      That must be adhered in all issues and always. You conveniently ignored many of my posts where I had asked some basic questions. Good for you. Im not going to post again until some rational points are made insted of giving links to some Islamic fundamentalist's videos.

      Finally, I have observed the only people who support the ban are either the Muslims who are eternally offended by anything that happens anywhere in the world about their religion and some of the upper caste people who have grievances against Kamal and MK and those who are fans of JJ.

      You guys need to grow up and see the big picture. We are slowly moving towards talibanization of India. Wake up and Smell the coffee. Dear madam, The line of thinking that Kamal Haasan has reaped the fruits of his earlier acts in the ban of his movie 'vishwaroopam' is not acceptable to me.

      In fact it further hurts the sentiments of the vast majority of Hindu public. Why because when the religious sentiments of the majority community was challenged by this crooked minded actor by depictions of hindu-hatred incidences which have no historical background, making mockery of hindu deities and depicting members of brahmin community in bad light, there was no government action initiated. May be because there was no major threat to the law and order situation as the affected people have not chosen to express their opposition in violent ways.

      The present action on the part of government may encourage all people to express their opposition in future in such ways which will be accorded due importance by the government. Not a positive trend. The sentiments of the hindu community cannot be assuaged by the ban of his any other movie.

      Of course, the right-thinking and knowledgeble public have mentally boycotted this actor long ago which is the greatest failure for any artiste, however successful he may be commercially. Dear Mr Rajesh, I am amazed at your rational thinking and I must admit that I am nowhere near you in thinking rationally.

      Perhaps your grooming in the paasarai of MK and Kamal helped you in this. I must thank you for your a rational and thoughtful suggestion on how we have to register a protest — make a movie in retaliation for the movie we hate, write a blog in retaliation of an offensive blog and draw a cartoon as a rebuttal to an offending cartoon.

      I can write a blog, that is not a problem. But the problem here is the movie. Let me also become rational like you, make a movie with them as a rebuttal and get back to you for more advice. Predictable response.. Let me be clear. I'm a supporter of Hindu Right and consider the Islamic fundamentalism the biggest threat. That's why I'm against any kind of pandering to their threat. I'm no fan of Kamal or MK either. On the contrary, I had little respect for JJ that she will stand out from the rest, but she has proved that she is similar to MK, Kamal etc.

      When Islamists attack, all of them bend backwards. But some of the upper castes have behaved like Islamists themselves. Normally they speak against Islam and for Hinduism, but when it comes to their Brahmin caste, they don't worry even if Hindus are affected, their enemies suddenly becomes the dravidian fundamentalists like MK, Periyar and the Islamists become their friends. That's what happened in this case. Since Kamal is involved and JJ is on the other side, they support the ban even if it means bending to Islamists.

      It was really an eye opening incident for me. I naively believed that everyone on the Hindu-Right will speak in the same voice. But I have been proved wrong. People like you have shown your true colours. Thank you for that. Honest answer please. I think that's what democracy means. I don't want to be ruled like Taliban where any offense is paid with blood.

      Only if there is a direct incitement of violence, it should be banned. Nothing else. PS: It will expose you better if you or those who are supporting the ban can reply to my earlier points. Or if you find them offensive you can go ahead and 'ban' them or 'remove' them since I had asked some inconvenient questions just like you are supporting the ban of VR.

      After all, you seem to support Talibanisation. Dear Mr Narayanan, I don't think this issue would become a precedent for similar demands for ban in future. Times are such that nothing can happen by the whims and fancies of the people whomever they may be.

      There is a court to settle all these. Even the current issue is in the court. If Kamal does not want to agree to the demands of the Muslims in the tripartite talks, he can argue his case in the court once the proceedings begin.

      So I think that worry is unfounded. Infact every act that JJ does is challenged in the court. Such is the venomous and vehemous opposition to her by the Dravidian loyalists, mainly because they can not continue with their corrupt ways as long as she is power. JJ of today is like a Simma soppanam for them. But Kamal could not bear this challenge to his movie and said that he would go away from country. That is the level of his inner strength and conviction.

      You don't seem to agree that he is reaping for what he had done all along. You have said that no action was initiated when he did all those nasty depictions on Hindus. Even now this issue would not have come this far if MK is in Govt.

      The Muslims would have expressed their objection as they did now and MK would have called Kamal to do something about it. Kamal would have obliged, there is nothing like artistic freedom blah blah for him. All that matters is money and paying his debt on this movie. Who knows, if MK was back power this time too, Kamal would have gone to him or Marans or the grandsons to help him out in the production.

      Rajini did that in Enthiran. Poor Kamal, he did not have MK in power when he had a finance problem in this movie. In that case, Kamal would have obliged MK and removed whatever scene was asked to be removed by the Muslims. One example to show that Kamal is guided by business interest and not artistic freedom is that he had retained a scene in the version for American audience which he cut for Indian audience.

      In that scene the terrorist would say that he is not worried about the safety of the women of his family as the Americans would not harm the women. This is an unnecessary dialogue and I doubt whether any Al queda terrorist would ever say this. But Kamal had this dialogue presumably to please the American audience. Kamal cut this dialogue in the Indian version. Is it to show himself with anti-American communist leanings?

      Or did he think that by cutting this scene in the Tamil version, he is being Muslim-friendly or else it would give an impression that Americans won't harm the women but Muslims would - a historical fact we have known from the records of invading Muslims? He can not afford to do it in a mega budget film. If he does, he has to face the consequences. For everything a time must come. Kamal is not lucky like Enthiran Rajini as MK is no longer in power.

      His continuous unleash of arrogant depictions needed time to gather mass. As I told in the article, he had to become resolved to that again and again until it reaches a stage when he would no longer use his good sense. Even now he believes that he didn't do anything harmful to the Muslims. Look at the arrogance in telling that it is not Muslims but Hindu Munnani Rama Gopalan who had to complain. Only arrogance can fight arrogance. That is happening how, but within legal and constitutional framework.

      I don't think he would ever think that he was wrong in depicting Hindus in bad light. His metal make up is so well established in the perverted conception of ideas on Hindus and Hinduism that would never change in this birth. He will have to get blows like how he is getting now. Narayanan, we can also look at this way. This is where the sanchita, prarabhdha karmas comes to play I am a regualr reeader of this blog. This one article has invited more than 60comments and even this is spreading some kind of positive and negative vibes and making many uncomfortable.

      Madam was educating us and sharing info on so many good things related to sanatana dharma. This post has taken her quality time from that. This Bhasmasura will get what is due for him. IN the past, we have seen many rationals coming back to Spritual fold at the later part of life, if this incident teaches him a lesson and if he also comes back, let us welcome him. God bless all Skandan. Mr Rajesh, This is becoming a big comic relief in the midst of a serious discussion. You support Hindu- Right?

      Oh God save Hindus. Can't you have a Chanakya buddhi in an issue like this? Its a waste having you in the fight for Hindu Right. By the way I don't find any point in searching for the 'earlier points' of yours. Instead I suggest that you search for the points in my comments that apply to your points, ok?

      Dear Mr Skandan, After reading your comment, I was wondering whether I really succeeded in putting forth the advantages from the current issue. Most of it, I have written in the comments section only. Muslim fundamentalism and Christian evangelism can not be checked without a change in the constitution or in the attitude of the rulers in the centre. Nirupama confides with a psychologist that it's a marriage of convenience that provided her a safe haven for pursuing her Ph. D in the U. The age gap between them notwithstanding, she is put off by Vishwanath's effeminate traits and is attracted to her boss, Deepak Samrat Chakrabarti.

      Doubting whether her husband has secrets of his own, she hires a private investigator to trail him. She learns from the private investigator that Vishwanath is not a Hindu but a Muslim. In a sudden turn of events, the investigator gets killed by a member of the terrorist outfit led by Omar. A business card on his wallet gives away Nirupama and the terror group nabs the couple. The outfit operates from a warehouse on the outskirts of the city where the couple is being interrogated.

      Vishwanath is involved in a fight with the terrorists at the warehouse and escapes with Nirupama. Omar and Vishwanath have a past, one that takes the story back by almost a decade, to the Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan.

      Kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent the 69 eyes gothic girl album torrent

      DOWNLOAD NEW HINDI MOVIES IN ONE CLICK - WITH PROOF - NO TORRENT REQUIRED kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent

      LEON MICHEL Y LUPITA TORRENTERA E

      Click on highlighted current computer default geometric, highly legible international with conference victories from previous sessions, and past to check if keep data healthy. Once you click need to upgrade export button it will display the host-based security stack. Comodo companies are Executing backup script.

      Nationalization of Islam and Christianity is the only way to go forward for a united India. It's high time that Indian Muslims and Christians need to be identified separately from their alien counterparts. As someone said not sure if it's Sister Nivedita or Annie Besant , until Muslims and Christians consider anything outside India as their sacred land, they'll not be able to co-exist with Indians in India.

      At the same time I want to make one more comment. I believe you too have a prejudiced mindset when writing this article. Are you in any way forced to support the Muslims, just because you want to justify all your future protests of such incidents against Hindus?

      Some people like Gnani are arguing from the point of view of freedom of expression. What are your thoughts on that? The Aurangazeb exhibition is one example of freedom of expression. I believe you don't support the act of Prince of Arcot in that exhibition. Don't you think it's another case of denial of freedom of expression for the group that conducted the exhibition? Certainly cinema of the kind we are seeing today can not be called as freedom of expression.

      I have written this in the post and even asked why the Prince of Arcot is silent now. Nicely written. Echoed some of the thoughts I had after watching the trailer clips that they have been showing. I am not a great movie buff or an ardent Kamal fan but I feel that artists have a certain responsibility becos of the power of the movie medium to influence common people.

      In all these arguments about freedom of expression and creativity that we hear on TV people have forgotten about the vast majority of people who get influenced by what they see on screen. And I have also been wondering whether should give protection for the movie? Is it the State's job? And supposing the movie is permitted and something untoward happens is the State to be blamed?

      I think Kamal anticipated these problems and was pushing for a DTH release. He was pretty sure that many things in the movie will effect people and still wanted to go ahead with it. More than the ban what irked me the most was the pettiness in threatening to leave TN.

      Damn silly. What's wrong in showing some Islamic kings in fact almost all of them in bad light if that's what they've done to Hindus? You have written so many articles in bad light on the DK groups. If a group of members from that group come and ask you to stop writing about them stating that it hurts their sentiments, will you then stop writing about them? Freedom of expression is not all, but it is something that's required for every being.

      Today, some groups might come and ask for a ban on the movie, and tomorrow some other group may ask for the same quoting some other reasons. If you start encouraging them, then no film or art can be released. You must understand that you cannot run this blog if there is lack of freedom of expression. I'm not supporting Kamal in any way. That idiot has to be condemned for sure for his derogatory comments against Hinduism and Hindu culture.

      But there is a way to do it, and by banning a film you'll only make him more aggressive. If what he has committed is wrong, he has to be attacked at the intellectual level. Popular Hindu leaders must openly criticize him for his comments on Hinduism in public speeches and continue to do it constantly, or make alternate films to counter that. It's only because they fail to do so that idiots like him continue to make such derogatory comments.

      Banning a film will not help in any way for sure. I am the first commenter, thanks for your response. My support for JJ remains unchanged despite my views on this issue and the severe backlash on this issue on Twitter is not good for her image. Kamal hassan comment on future PM was uncalled for but still he should not be made a scapegoat for political gains.

      You said. The first part of the article in a comment on the Aurangazeb exhibition which Prince of Arcot stalled. For any issue, there may be several facets for it. One must possess a discriminatory knowledge to decide which issue takes precedence at a time or which issue needs immediate attention. It is like treating an emergency case in a trauma ward.

      The doctor would first concentrate on reviving the vital parameters and plugging the bleeding. Only after that is okeyed he would start treating the other wounds. Same logic applies here. In the incident of Prince of Arcot stopping the exhibition, it is first and foremost an unpatriotic act. The govt which assisted in that also has demonstrated its unpatriotic attitude. Then only the freedom of expression comes.

      That incident also deserves to be called as cultural terrorism, a term Kamal used. That incident deserved national attention and remedies. If I or anyone criticizes that that incident, the question of breach of freedom of expression does not arise there.

      It is only a case of standing up for the nation and its dignity. The gift of DK and MK to the nation is now legend. There is no second opinion about the kind of damage they had done to the society. Where they had to be questioned, I have questioned. There was no personal agenda in all those writings. If you have noticed I would have avoided derogatory adjectives to individuals like how you have used the word 'idiot' in the last para but used strong objections to thoughts and actions that have harmed the collective many.

      Here again the foremost reason is setting right a wrong. They can not come and tell me that I have hurt their sentiments, for it is they who hurt others' sentiments first and are receiving a rebuttal for it. In this context I want to explain what is freedom of expression and when it needs to be stalled for the sake of protecting some thing or someone else. It is here let me quote the Hustler Magazine Inc. The judgement makes a qualitative description that if freedom of an expression by one causes an 'intentional infliction of emotional distress to the other whom it is directed at , then that is no longer a freedom of expression and the other is entitled for constitutional protection.

      This second idea is enshrined in giving remedy in defamation cases in India. The question of freedom of expression is involved in defamation cases too. But if that expression has no valid basis or truth in it, then it is not considered as freedom of expression. If there is truth in it, it is no longer defamation.

      The speaker is well within his right to speak the truth. Suppose that expression has no truth in it, the affected party is considered to be genuinely aggrieved. When the expression has no truth in it and then it also means there is an intention behind that expression to cause harm to the affected party. Such an expression is not considered to be a freedom of expression.

      In the light of this basic definition and application of what constitutes freedom of speech, let me analyse your accusations and also the topic of the article. The easy -to -understand example for where the freedom of expression stops, is MF Hussain. There was an emotional distress caused by his works. None of those depictions were true say for example in his work on Goddess Saraswathi, the depiction is not the true character of the Goddess.

      One may argue that he did not do it intentionally. May be the first time, this argument can hold water. But once after the opposition to such depictions have started coming out, every other painting that he made thereafter can not be unintentional. He has certainly trespassed the limit of freedom of expression. Coming to my article above, the underlying idea is that Kamal, who has been a habitual offender of Hindus has met with his waterloo in Vishwaroopam. Every nasty dialogue on Hindus and Hindu Gods and nasty depiction of Brahmins in his films were not true in essence and have caused emotional distress to many.

      By repeating it film after film, he has exhibited his deliberate intention to depict in that way. This can be contrasted to what he is saying now for Vishwaroopam. He keeps saying that he did not include any material in the movie to hurt the sentiments of Muslims. He has clearly conveyed that he had no intention to hurt or cause distress to the Muslims.

      He has behaved like a truth telling machine. So there is no intention to hurt Muslims and so he can not be accused. Did he ever express the same thing to the Hindus any time for any of the movies that hurt the Hindus? That means he had a deliberate intention to say those things that hurt the Hindus.

      He even proudly gave a statement in his dealings with Muslims initially over this movie that Rama Gopalan of Hindu Munnani might accuse him after seeing this movie but never can a Muslim accuse him for this movie. How blatantly he has conveyed that he knew very well that certain scenes are going to offend the Hindus! This is clearly a misuse of freedom of expression for which he is liable to pay damages - may be in the US and sadly not in India. We don't see any sensible people or mechanism to tell him all these.

      We are hopelessly watching him do this for years and seething with anger and anguish. But now a situation has risen when he unintentionally hurt the Muslims by his habitual use of intentional breach of limit of freedom of expression. There is a definite glee over seeing him get what is due, though in small measures, for he deserves a life long distress of karmic rebuttal for what he has done to Hindus. Even his so-called threat of leaving the country and self-exile if protests are going to continue, is directed at Muslims.

      He does not want to see them angry with him or go against him. It is a polished way of threatening them "see how I am always your friend, now I have made this movie with all my money and there is absolutely no intention to hurt you. After all this confession, if you are going to be angry with me, what can I do, where can I be, other than leaving the country". It is like some love dialogue of a couple in dual. In this context let us see if there is any genuine distress caused to the Muslims by Kamal in the movie.

      I have pinpointed only 2 issues in the article, 1 stereotyping the Muslim as a terrorist - the visual impact of such depiction would disturb the harmony of the people living together with the Muslims in the neighborhood.

      Any Muslim who is having a good relationship with neighbors is likely to apprehend what his neighbors would think when he reads Koran or follows the rituals strictly as shown in the movie. There is scope to believe that many innocent Muslims would become disturbed over this. I have highlighted this part in the article and consider this as an avoidable distress.

      They will also have to see how others around them view them. These are all small things for others, but real things within the small communities in rural side. The present controversy has highlighted the scope for it and even requires the militant elements among them to tone down. So I don't think there is anything wrong in asking others to stop harping on this image of Muslims which is completely true in Afghanisthan but not true in Tamilnadu.

      In my opinion, such depictions would drive the Muslims towards extreme steps while what is needed is to make them join the main stream. I find an opportunity in the current episode for better developments. Though the Muslims are aware that they are a vote bank, the current development has the potential to make them think whether they must allow themselves to be a vote bank anymore.

      Vote bank comes into existence when a group or community behaves in a unanimous way. They must now introspect whether it does any good to them to be a vote bank always jumping from one camp to another and vice versa. It is akin to the existence of a paid thug. With education and exposure to outside world, they would start resisting being like this. None of the Muslims are Muslims by their choice.

      They are Muslims because their ancestors were not lucky like my or your ancestor in having escaped the line of fire by invading Muslims. Their ignorance about this fact must be removed. Colonial records show that even as late as s, Muslims lived like Hindus and avoided the Mullahs.

      If you had read Mr Subbhu's Dravida mayai series in Thuglak, in the last week issue he has written how one "Bhagdad Sahib" intervened to question Periyar when he made some uncharacteristic remark. The name Bhagdad Sahib tells about is origins from outside India.

      The Preachers were brought from Persia but all the others were locals who were forced to convert to Islam. It is an innate desire of man to know his roots. The Tamil Muslims would also start to search for their roots some day.

      As long as they are working as a vote bank of Congress or DMK, they can not start that search. They must come out of them. Like how a majority of Muslims lent support to Modi in the recent elections on their own volition and not as a vote bank, conditions must arise in TN for them to cease to be a vote bank and be free to exercise their choice. The current development is a Pillaiyar chuzhi for that time to come. I think the other part of your comment has answers from my above explanation.

      Better not talk like Shinde by saying some one will come tomorrow and ask for a ban. Have clarity of the genuine grievance and intentional hurting as the motive in the name of freedom of speech. In the present episode, ban order had hurt Kamal than anything else. He continues to blabber as we see in his Mumbai speech. It reminded me of continuing resolve that God makes a man to have which I explained in the article.

      Experiences are there to make us learn and unlearn certain lessons. His Mumbai speech shows that he has not yet learned lessons. That means his troubles would continue. Dear Jayasree Mam, I have a couple of points to make a 'The treatment of muslims as vote bank stands more exposed than ever before. If Jaya is going to indulge in votebank politics and polarize communities,How is she different from K?

      Does it mean that if Jaya practices vote bank politics,it is going to be beneficial for the country. Why this double standards are to be followed? I have no love lost for kamal but the way this has been done by communalizing it smacks of bad politics.

      A few examples of personal vendetta as coming in english newspapers Ex:1TNEB officials visited the house of Kamal 's advocoate to ascertain if his connections are OK. This was the first time they have ever come to his house. Fairness Here? Ex 2: Attacks on theaters by ruling party men and the police going all out to stop the shows.

      People who have seen the film do not see any assertions of showing muslims in bad light. The hero is shown as a patriotic muslim and villians i. Wonder why we should associate with the taliban. It is just like how we had protestors disrupting the Aurangazeb exhibtion who was fanatic causing immense suffering to Hindus.

      I understand the point that cinema is a powerful medium. Children are influenced easily but it would be too far fetched to state we take all that happens in a film seriously. Any mature adult would not do so else with the kind of negative content shown we would be running around with murders,rapes and all films need to be banned. As it is, her policies and development record shows she is no patch on Modiji. It would be good if advisors can request her to focus on more pressing issues instead of such vote bank politics.

      Another post in the same way that some upper castes have reacted to the situation- Kamal has portrayed Brahmins in wrong way earlier, so let him experience this. Jayalalitha is upper caste, so what she did is OK even if it is pandering to Islamic fundamentalists.. Audience go and watch the film, they are not forced. If the movie depicts them in wrong way, let them not watch it.

      Let them issue a fatwa or something so that their community do not watch it. Next thing is, what happens to other communities watching it? The same thing that happens when someone watches Al Aqeda and Taliban videos in youtube. Do we ban Youtube also? Internet next? It's funny that people are OK watching masala movies with actresses almost naked, bedroom scenes etc.

      Regarding depiction of Brahmins, Kamal is not the first one to do it. Same advice to you also. Jaya has shown that she is a psychopant coward bending backwards to the Islamic radicals. SOme of them were even members of former Al Umma who were involved in Coimbatore bomb blasts. To accept her decision is to accept that we are in control of such elements and this is no more a democracy.

      Can someone explain how watching a movie creates such an Impact in the society? I mean we have something like movies yearly.. How many have such impact? Has anyone started rioting after watching a movie?

      Did anyone stop giving or bribing after watching 'Indian'? Has everyone become responsible after watching 'Anniyan'? Did terrorism end after 'Kurudhi Punal'? Did everyone played top on women's navel after watching Chinnakounder? Then what the hell does that mean? I find his paintings pathetic. But I cannot say he should not do it. Maybe you draw him nude as a payback. But you or anyone else do not have the right to say he tresspassed the Right.

      Freedom of expression should be absolute. If you do not like it, do not watch it. I am not sure I agree with this article. Personal liking or dislike of Kamal is not the point. Kamal cannot be blamed for what HarmonyIndia did or did not do. Such "guilt by association" theory is irrelevant to the core issue. It's a movie that depicts international terrorism in fact, there are very few Indian characters. The move is intended for an adult audience and it not intended for kids below 15 based on its censor certification.

      Most people such as yourself who pass comments basically arrive from a Hindutva based perspective. Oh, Kamal is a brahmin basher. He is a Hindu basher. So let him suffer. Again, that is not the point. A movie has been made that has cleared the censors. It has been screened in multiple states and soon even more states all over India without incident. So, what is the issue? Fringe Islamist groups which have alleged connections with other terrorist groups associated with Coimbatore bomb blasts feel aggrieved by the depiction of terrorists such as Al Qaeda and Taliban.

      Because they sympathize with Taliban. Now, what would a sane head of govt. Hear out the grievances of these alleged terrorists, see the movie and check if the allegations are correct. Verify if the movie deliberately portrays Muslims and their faith in a wrong light. Verify if the film says anything seriously objectionable that will hurt people of certain faith in India.

      Does not watch the movie but instead used the muslim terrorists views to heavy-handedly ban the movie so as to create a huge financial loss to the movie maker. And, by the way, to hell with freedom of expression, it screams. What do learned commentators such as yourself do?

      Discuss everything besides the core issue. Dear Mr Pratap, I think you have not read the article properly and the comments posted by me, particularly the last comments by me that appear above your comment. All these - my comments and JJ's explanation contain the answers. Anyway a quick go-through of your objections: a What is dangerous is the Muslim community continuing to be a vote bank of the Congress and the DMK. It is more likely the current controversy is going to break the connection between the Muslims and Congress- DMK.

      That is good for the nation and for democracy. When are the Muslims going to realise that must not serve as a vote bank? Read the above comments. JJ in her interview clearly said what would happen if the movie was not banned and some violence takes place. The inevitable police actions quelling the protests would end up with some harm to someone in the protesting group which would be exploited by the DMK and seconded by the media.

      JJ would be branded as some one hurting the Muslims. It is MK who always does politics which no one in TN can deny. The foremost need of the times is to make the Muslims stop being used as a vote bank of DMK and the Congress. If you are not convinced of this statement, it means you are not a keen observer of politics at the centre and TN for at least the last few years.

      One must know that this idea of TV rights was planted by Savukku - who is known for his dubious intentions. And I think you are not aware of what is doing, covering every facet of the society and economy. Two things worth commenting on Rajesh's first comment. The issue is what would happen if others watch the movie.

      What others would think of the people who have been portrayed in bad light. This is the apprehension of the Muslim groups. I have explained enough that perspective in the article and the comments. Did you see the reaction of Jawaharilla after JJ's interview?

      The message is that they would have unleashed violence and created serious law and order problem if the film was screened. The dull headed interviewer failed to catch up this and failed to counter him. This message is clearly understood by JJ and even MK knows this. Who had helped them or made them to grow to this level?

      Kamal believed that they would not do this back to him, but he is wrong. So what to do in this situation? The first requirement is to make them severe their nexus with these political elements. JJ didn't do it, but Kamal initiated it and others of his camp followed suit. Now the Muslims have come to know of the true colours of these 'secular friends' which they repeatedly said in the TV debates.

      That is the point we - as you call 'the upper castes' - have noted down. Rajesh's 2nd comment:- Explained in the article and comments of the apprehended impact. Rajesh's 3rd comment:- Seems he had written this without reading my comments on freedom of expression. For the kind of portrayals done by MF Hussein and of Hindus and Brahmins by Kamal, if we have the law like in the US they would have been punished or restrained.

      I quoted a website on a judgement like that. He had written that we can do the same thing as a pay back drawings. This is most senseless way of approach, to say the least. Kumar Srinivas. Soon after this controversy broke out, it was Kamal who expressed his association with Harmony India as a justification to say that he would not harm the sentiments of Muslims.

      Why did he say this association, if not for the kind of works it had done for 'safeguarding Muslim interests' even if it means going to the extent of stalling a show that showed Aurangazeb in bad light? This is Nature's law. I wrote on the other facet that could affect an innocent and non violent Muslim. The movie is going to hurt the violent Muslims too. That is now becoming the center of attention with the escalation of the controversy. This part also is the core part that the Muslims don't want the fellow Indians to see.

      But kamal does not seem to budge - according to them. From today onwards North India where Muslim vote bank politics is ruling the roost is going to see. This is the catch. This is what I say doing a Bhasmasura by Kamal. Even while claiming himself as a friend of Muslims, Kamal is becoming instrumental in creating a visual impact on the minds of the rest of India on this Muslim identity.

      The Muslims would not forget it. My wish is that this serves as a wake up call for them and change their attitudes which I have written in the last para of the article. In a situation like this, the govt did what it must do. I think you are not aware of the developments taking place for long before the supposed release of the movie.

      If you are a Tamil, read the Juvi article given in the last link in the article. On censor board, I have an observation. I think it was only after the Ad-Gen of Govt questioned the censor certificate to this movie in the court, things developed fastly. Leela Samson said that she would sue him for which he retaliated that he would face it in the court and ask the judge to appoint an committee to enquire into the censor certificates.

      The Muslim debater in Arnab's show kept saying this to Leela and one can see leela squirming in her seat. Something is amiss in the censor board. This is like Kamal doing a Bhasmasura on the film industry. This is when the filmdom rushed to Kamal to convince him to remove objectionable scenes. If this scam comes out, all those really upper class people not me Mr Kumar Srinivas, I don't touch money who have been parading as film icons would be biting the dust.

      Kamal was willing to show them. But he wanted to show them the previous day to the release so that if they object to anything, he can say what he can do at the 11th hour. This point is noted by the Muslim organizations.

      On freedom of expression, I wish we become more educated on what is meant by freedom of expression. I gave an explanation for it from legal sources. Anyone can bring to our notice from legal sources. We will see how it applies to the controversy. Interesting article and follow up comments. My 2 cents on this. Number two: Acknowledge the atrocities done against Hindus in the past, to their temples and to their people.

      Give solid assurance that these kind of actions will never take place in future. This means no conversion, open or in covert ways. We as a nation can move forward peacefully only then. This applies to the Christians also. Until then, whether this movie shows Muslims in a bad light or not is an irrelevant point.

      They have not set any great example in the past to think otherwise. I cannot recall objection from any Muslim organization when the Hindus were at the receiving end of Muslim atrocities. For a start,have you heard of any fatwas from the Muslim organizations against Islamists in Kashmir when they drove out the Pandits? Thought so.

      JJ wisely pointed out age of kamal as 60 and later corrected to 58 purposely to make a dent on his self created image and remind him that he is no more a charming young hero to talk about his imagination of playing big role in future film world presumably in reply to kamal interview that he will be a seed and will grow as a tree and later as a choolai- garden. Therefore he can not be crushed When the film "Dasavataram" was released,kamal invited karuna family members and had shown them preview show exclusively for their family and others.

      He did not invite for his own movie the present CM jj. Hence jj rightly pointed out that she is not seeing any movie nowadays only by keeping this in her mind. You are an iconic actor who has done the state and country proud. They do not think so. They feel I have been making too many controversial films and I need to be tamed and brought to my knees. So today I am being labelled anti-Islamic because the terrorists in my film owe their allegiance to Al Qaeda.

      They also forget that I was the first actor who stood up and condemned the demolition of the Babri Masjid. I am a friend of the Muslim community. In fact because of my name, I am often mistaken for one at international airports.

      That means zilch to these people. The interesting thing is, not one terrorist in my film is an Indian. All the terror activity in the film is located in Afghanistan. Some Muslim brethren objected to references to Al Qaeda. I removed those. Are we romancing rationality here? I have tried to reason with Ms Jayalalitha. But she refused to meet me arguing that the matter is subjudice and that I should meet the Home Minister. Now, the Home Minister would have the same argument about the matter of being subjudice.

      I had met him and apprised him of my film and the situation before the court hearing. Not a leaf stirs in the state without her knowledge. I think the issue has gone far beyond my film. I am ready to face the consequences. I am going to take the print of the Tamil version of Vishwaroop and burn it in front of the relevant government office.

      They are aborting my baby. I might as well give it a proper cremation. This is a conspiracy to finish me off financially. To kill me. To make sure I am never able to make another film. And that is as good as death for me. Like I said, it is an irrational attack.

      Is it because you took up the DTH issue? My phone is tapped. Q: That sounds ominous…Can they finish you off? They can finish me off. I am a very arrogant man. I have just returned from a very successful world premiere of my film in Los Angeles. I am not saying anything. Q: The Tamil Nadu Govt banned your film even after the censor board cleared it? Clearly then, the censor board is redundant at least in Tamil Nadu. They should shut their office in Tamil Nadu. Yes, my Muslim brethren here in India have spoken to their Muslim brethren in Malaysia.

      That is old-fashioned. It may be old-fashioned. Why old-fashioned? He mortgaged everything to make Pather Panchali. I wanted to go many steps further. Okay, now I can be called a Ray Ban laughs heartily. This is no …. I am serious. I will be a pauper. I believe that no individual should own property. That it should be for the people.

      Whatever property I have came to me through cinema and I gave it back to cinema. And my financiers are not ones to yield to my plight. I might get arrested. They arrested Gandhiji too. Vishwaroop is my child. Politics is my nemesis. They want to abort my child. I am supposed to talk to Christians, Muslims and politicians to save my child. Why would I address my creativity to fascism? I will collect funds through a public company. I will get like minded people to fund my dreams.

      The movie is running in other parts too. That means the returns are of course there and he can not claim that he would become a paupar if the movie does not run in TN. Of the total budget, he was supposed to get 25 crores as his salary. That puts 70 to 75 crores as his investment. The 30 to 70 crore loss for the delay might perhaps be about the loss in his projected profit of crores. Why then does he make a big drama on his financial ruination?

      How much absurd can it get? If a villain of a movie is a doctor, will people think all doctors are bad? Just because terrorists are shown as Muslims doesn't mean people will think that Muslims are prone to terrorism. Shivaji would have been banned by College owners. Maatran would have been banned by Health drink companies. Where will it end? What kind of a government is it that accepts this threat? If MK did it, shouldn't she show some spine and stand up to the goons instead of succumbing to the same vote bank?

      Let me know how come positive movies like Indian, Anniyan etc. No reasonable person will believe that things shown in a movie are real and the communities are stereotyped are real. This case of Islamic fundamentalists will not win in the US. If someone inflicts a offense in a medium which is considered fictional like cartoons, satirical artcles etc.

      If politicians start protesting every cartoon, then there will not be any cartoonists in the world. Same with movies. So, protesting on the streets, holding the state to ransom are better than paying back through cartoons and drawings? I thought we are living in a democracy and not under Taliban..

      If you stop the free flow of ideas and speaches, no reforms will occur. People like Vivekananda, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Gandhi, Ambedkar etc would never have achieved what they did if the goons from the 'offended'communities were given their way. Bharathiyar would not have been able to write and spoke against casteism, women empowerment etc.

      What you are asking for a dangerous trend. Stop the hate against MK, Kamal from clouding your opinion. What you are batting for is talibanization of the society slowly. The next generation may not be able to even write blogs like this if this trend continues. Moreover, Indic traditions have a wonderful history of debate and encouraging it. Let us not follow the Desert bloc habit of fundamentalist positions in everything and get offended by anything.

      My wish is that this serves as a wake up call for them and change their attitudes which I have written in the last para of the article" Come on.. This is not the first film in which terrorists are shown as Muslims and neither is Kamal so famous in North India as some others.

      This hype that one movie can create so big impact in the minds of people is incorrect. If so, people like Hitler, Gandhi etc. I would like to conclude by saying that the proper way to register protest is by peaceful demonstrations. If a movie hurts you, take another movie rebutting it.

      If a blog hurts you, write your own blog. If a cartoon offends you, draw your own rebutting it. Asking someone to ban something because it offends you is something that should only happen in Taliban rule and should not have a place in Democracy. The State cannot bend backwards to these fundamentalists for vote bank.

      The courts should be consistent in their judgement and uphold the artistic freedom against goons. What can be more stupid than people agreeing to movies with semi naked actresses' body parts are shown vulgarly but want to ban a movie on terrorism? Hi all I request all regualar readers of Madam's blog to view the below link. J Tamilnadu tawahit Jamad speech on Vishwaroopam. There are 5 parts. Please watch all the 5 parts and then come to a conclusion.

      Shah Rukh Khan and Viswaroopam. Sharuk is very worried about release of Vishwaroopam. Addressing Mr Rajesh's further comments, I think the video link of the 5 parts of the speech by the Muslim leader explains very clearly and logically the holes in the arguments of anti-ban people and also the justification for pro-ban. Instead of writing the same thing to Mr Rajesh, I think I can ask him to listen to that speech. Other readers also can listen and share their comments.

      There are of course certain things I wish to say on that speech. The issue on MF Hussain is spoken by that leader. I don't agree that since because he was a Muslim we were against his depictions. Anyone who had depicted like that will have be condemned. The speech touches on the remark of Kamal that it is cultural terrorism by Muslims. In the course of his argument to challenge it, he quotes Kamal's personal life and how Shruti Hassan expressed her desire to pair with her own father in a movie.

      This was selectively quoted in some forums casting a bad impression on the speaker. But when seen in the context I did not see anything wrong in this part of the speech. There was an explanation of "Vishwaroopam" linking it to Vamana avathara. He uses the message of that avatar to say that the movie was aimed at Hindus destroying Muslims by the Vishwaroopam.

      But he must have checked the Hindu scholars before making this explanation for Vamana avatara - in tune with what he has said that without knowing the real life and religion of Muslims one must not venture out to take movies on them.

      The concept of Vishwaroopam is not associated with Vamana avathara, but with Krishnavathara. Krishna takes Vishvaroopam to show the cosmic and all pervading and all controlling nature of Himself as God. To return the words of the speaker, he must have known the Hindu concepts before using it in the way he had used in the speech. Perhaps that explanation of Vamana was in mind of Kamal in naming this movie. This gives an impression that India harbours terrorists and all the premier intelligence agencies are incapable of detecting it.

      Valid point. The speaker zeroes in on the 2 issues I have touched in the article. In other words, a normal person with normal sensibilities would find these two issues objectionable. It would definitely irk the innocent friend. The commenting friend would, not know the difference between a Tamil Muslim and the terrorist shown in the movie. Since this Tamil Muslim link is shown, it would hurt the Tamil Mulsims. Same with the depiction of Brahmins.

      No one outside Tamil nadu can understand the derogation Kamal is heaping on Brahmins in his films, because they are directed at Tamil Brahmins and not the Brahmins of other States. In this movie, the Tamil Brahmin is depicted in bad light which is not true. There is as well no need to show the identity of the character as a Tamil Brahmin.

      But he is doing willfully and he must be taught a lesson. The one word from the speech that made me sit up is the fleeting reference to Mel Visharam. This is where my repeated contention in the above comments that they must become free thinking applies. The Muslims must come into the main stream and adhere to democratic means and thoughts. They exhibited their readiness to listen to democratic process and means in the Vishwaroopam episode so far.

      That must be adhered in all issues and always. You conveniently ignored many of my posts where I had asked some basic questions. Good for you. Im not going to post again until some rational points are made insted of giving links to some Islamic fundamentalist's videos. Finally, I have observed the only people who support the ban are either the Muslims who are eternally offended by anything that happens anywhere in the world about their religion and some of the upper caste people who have grievances against Kamal and MK and those who are fans of JJ.

      You guys need to grow up and see the big picture. We are slowly moving towards talibanization of India. Wake up and Smell the coffee. Dear madam, The line of thinking that Kamal Haasan has reaped the fruits of his earlier acts in the ban of his movie 'vishwaroopam' is not acceptable to me. In fact it further hurts the sentiments of the vast majority of Hindu public. Why because when the religious sentiments of the majority community was challenged by this crooked minded actor by depictions of hindu-hatred incidences which have no historical background, making mockery of hindu deities and depicting members of brahmin community in bad light, there was no government action initiated.

      May be because there was no major threat to the law and order situation as the affected people have not chosen to express their opposition in violent ways. The present action on the part of government may encourage all people to express their opposition in future in such ways which will be accorded due importance by the government. Not a positive trend. The sentiments of the hindu community cannot be assuaged by the ban of his any other movie. Of course, the right-thinking and knowledgeble public have mentally boycotted this actor long ago which is the greatest failure for any artiste, however successful he may be commercially.

      Dear Mr Rajesh, I am amazed at your rational thinking and I must admit that I am nowhere near you in thinking rationally. Perhaps your grooming in the paasarai of MK and Kamal helped you in this. I must thank you for your a rational and thoughtful suggestion on how we have to register a protest — make a movie in retaliation for the movie we hate, write a blog in retaliation of an offensive blog and draw a cartoon as a rebuttal to an offending cartoon.

      I can write a blog, that is not a problem. But the problem here is the movie. Let me also become rational like you, make a movie with them as a rebuttal and get back to you for more advice. Predictable response.. Vishwanath is involved in a fight with the terrorists at the warehouse and escapes with Nirupama. Omar and Vishwanath have a past, one that takes the story back by almost a decade, to the Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan.

      What follows is a maze of events that go back and forth in time, unraveling a plot where in the terrorists are accumulating cesium from oncology devices to trigger a blast in New York. Nirupama is stunned to discover the true identity of her husband Vishwanath, his uncle Shekhar Kapur , American accomplice Dawkins Miles Anderson and the young dancer Ashmita Andrea Jeremiah at her husband's dance school.

      His mission is to bust the 'sleeper-cell' of the Jihadis in the US, which is planning to divert the attention through "capsules" capable of emitting mild nuclear radiation tied to pigeons in New York city while enabling Black James Babson to detonate the cesium bomb in the city. Together, the team try to counter the plans of Omar and his group that could destroy the most of the New York city.

      In the ensuing events, Vishwanath is arrested by the FBI before being rescued by his uncle and Dawkins is murdered by Salim. Whether Vishwanath along with the FBI were able to stop the calamity to be unfolded forms the rest of the story. Powered by Yo vBulletin Torrent Tracker v. HD Video.

      Kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent gta 5 update 5 torrent

      Vishwaroopam - Vishwaroopam Video - Kamal Haasan

      Следующая статья bitmap brothers z steel soldiers torrent

      Другие материалы по теме

    • Ukrainska klaviatura skachat torrent
    • Wednesday night heroes discography torrents
    • Top country songs billboard 2011 torrent
    • Zoh bayreuth kontakt torrent
    • Категории: Album muse black holes and revelations torrent

    1 комментарии на “Kamal hassan vishwaroopam hindi torrent

    Добавить комментарий

    Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

    Предыдущие записи

    Тема от PWT, перевел WP-Templates.ru, поддержка SearchTimes.ru.